Category: social networking

Bye Bye Bebo

So, the imminent death of Bebo has been announced. I say death, as it seems unlikely anyone will want to buy an ailing social networking website in an English-speaking market dominated by Facebook .

I was on Bebo. For a while. Then I remembered that I hate people who talk in txt spk (vowels are there to be used, in my world), and witter mindlessly about drinking, and clubbing, and shopping. I grew out of that long ago, but it seems to be the main reason for Bebo’s continued existence. Being on it feels like a teenage contest of who was more drunk / spent more money / plastered more makeup on / fell over more.
Hence me deleting my account some time ago (along with my MySpace one).
And I’m retreating from Facebook more too: the effort to hide the endless updates from games that people are playing is annoying; I don’t need it to suggest friends for me, or patronisingly tell me to help other people find friends; I don’t want to play games endlessly – I work; I don’t need endless adverts for mobile phones, laptops and digital cameras. I pop on and off, see what friends are up to, occasionally use it to post photos that a wide range of friends might be interested in, then boogie off again. For a social networker, I’m getting less and less social!
Or maybe it’s just that I’m getting older. Maybe I’m becoming a Grumpy Old Woman.
Now…gerroff my lawn!

SLLG Christmas Networking Meeting

Yay, it’s almost time for the festive grumbling-about-suppliers and muttering-about-budgets SLLG Christmas meeting! And the musical speed-networking chairs game! No Scottish law librarian Christmas is complete without it!

It’s that time of year again. This year’s Christmas networking meeting will be held on Wednesday 9th December at 4pm in the SSC Library. Christine Wilcox has kindly offered to be host again and the meeting will be sponsored by Avizandum.

We will be sticking to our usual “speed networking” format followed by the ever-popular “mulled wine and mince pies” format.

If you would like to come please let me know and if you have any suggestions for discussion topics, even better.

If you’re a member of the Scottish Law Librarians Group, I hope to see you there. And *ssshhh*…I may even bring along some teeth-melting tablet too…
Also, while typing the title to this post, I created what I believe to be a new type of meeting: “newtworking”. It’s been suggested that this involves. “little newts with glasses and business cards”(@cronvek). I kinda like that idea!

Rating Facebook ads

Have you noticed the little ‘thumbs up’ and ‘thumbs down’ icons underneath those ads that appear (in new-look Facebook) along the right hand side of your screen?
Facebook allows you to rate these adverts, as shown in the text of the popup displayed below:

Tell us what you think

Why didn’t you like this ad?

Choose reason:
Misleading
Offensive
Pornographic
Uninteresting
Irrelevant
Repetitive
Other

Thanks for your feedback. Over time, this information helps us deliver more relevant ads to our users.

I have been studiously grading the adverts I get over the past few days, marking almost all of them as either ‘uninteresting’ or ‘irrelevant’, and actually, the amount of ads I’m now seeing for ‘miracle diets’ (wow, there’s an incredible range of insane diets out there!) , debt management companies, ‘free’ stuff, ways to live like a celebrity, fundraising as a mother (why that one for me? I don’t have kids, unless I’ve got really impressive amnesia), local foods in Birmingham, floristry courses at Bournville College, ways to fix bad credit ratings, credit card offers, accident compensation claims companies, and teeth whitening gels seems to be dropping off slightly.

But only slightly. I’m still seeing the same ads that I’ve graded as either ‘uninteresting’ or ‘irrelevant’ reappearing in the ad area. So what exactly are Facebook doing with my feedback?

Oh, wait, I’ve just noticed…now I have an advert for an “all natural loss product”…with no thumbs to rate it. I think Facebook has made a decision for me on what I really find irrelevant and uninteresting….

Facebook privacy and other such fun

I was allowed out last week (yes, entirely unsupervised! Well, apart from Lorna…) to attend a free Society for Computers and Law event on “Facebook and Social Networking Sites: Cyber-Stalking Paradise 2.0” Yes, I’m a sad geek, but hey, t’was free!  

The presentation was by Professor Lilian Edwards, who was an entertaining and informative speaker. The lack of inbuilt privacy in Facebook wasn’t new to me (I’d been in and fiddled with the settings to ‘lock down’ my profile only to approved friends, and block some people from finding me almost as soon as joining last September), but the discussion of why the site is so ‘open’ was something I’d not really thought about before.

Facebook was set up to be open, to allow social groups comprised of school years with school issued email addresses to network, and act as an online yearbook. Which was fine when those were the only people using the system, but when it was opened up to general use, there wasn’t a real understanding of what people were using. There’s no general awareness that the site is designed to share information, not to keep it secure. When a student at Oxford was caught by University staff in photos taking part in a banned after-exam flouring, was it her fault, or were her expectations of her privacy on the site just uninformed? Is she responsible for hunting down the information on how to make her profile more secure, or should Facebook be making this information more prominent? Currently, finding out who can see what about you is not particularly easy or straightforward, and can be difficult to understand. How wide a network is “friends of friends”? Ok, it’s obviously wider than “friends only”, but how far does “friends of friends” extend?

And who has ultimate control of what happens to images of you – you, or your friends? Anyone can upload a photo of you to Facebook, and tag you. The tag will only take you to the profile if you’re linked already, otherwise it’s just plain text. But if it’s an active tag, everyone can see those photos, which might not always show you in the best light. You do have the option to remove the tags linking you to photos if you find them inappropriate, but that means you have to be able to log in to Facebook at the time, and remove them. Also, there is apparently a way to prevent yourself being tagged in photos at all (I didn’t know this, and haven’t been in to my settings to have a look yet), but this just means you’ll never be notified that photos of you are uploaded, not that it stops them being uploaded. If only we all could rely on the good judgement of our friends, knowing that they’d not upload pictures that could reflect badly on ourselves…but if it doesn’t work for the Royal Family, what hope do we plebs have?

And the amount of sensitive information people share on there, yeek!! I’ve seen home phone numbers, mobile phone numbers, home addresses, workplace, work and personal email addresses, primary and secondary school information….one day, when my other crimes are discovered, maybe I’ll steal someone elses identity…

And finally, here’s a link to an article listing 13 reasons Facebook will lock or delete your profile…be good!!